Airtable Alternatives for Customer-Facing Portals
As a PM at a fast-growing fintech startup, you're constantly balancing competing priorities. Your engineering team is heads-down on core product features, yet stakeholders across the organization need tools yesterday. Sales wants a client portal. Operations needs a dashboard for tracking onboarding. Customer success is drowning in spreadsheets.
You've probably explored Airtable: it's flexible, visual, and your team already uses it internally. But it faces some issues: when it comes to customer-facing portals, Airtable falls short. Your clients don't want to see your database views. They need polished, branded experiences that feel like part of your product, not a glorified spreadsheet.
The good news? There's a new generation of tools purpose-built for this exact challenge. Let me walk you through why Airtable isn't the answer for customer portals and what alternatives actually work for fintech companies at your stage.
Airtable excels at internal collaboration. Your team can organize data, build workflows, and iterate quickly. But the moment you try to share something with customers, the cracks show.
Before diving into alternatives, let's clarify what you actually need. Customer portals in fintech serve specific purposes: giving clients visibility into their accounts, enabling self-service for common tasks, and reducing support burden.
So, what matters most?
Based on what fintech PMs at your stage actually need, here are the tools that deliver.:
Retool started as an internal tools platform but evolved to support customer-facing applications. It connects to your existing databases: PostgreSQL, MongoDB, whatever you're using, and lets you build custom interfaces with a drag-and-drop builder.
The main tool's advantage isflexibility. You can create exactly the experience you have in mind without writing React from scratch. Components for charts, tables, and forms snap together quickly. You control the entire layout and styling.
For fintech use cases, Retool's permission system is sophisticated enough to handle complex scenarios. You can gate features based on user roles, hide sensitive data conditionally, and audit all interactions.
The learning curve is steeper than Airtable, but not by much. Most PMs can build functional prototypes in a few hours. When you need custom logic, Retool supports JavaScript throughout, so your engineers can enhance what you've built without rewriting everything.
Pricing scales with usage, which works well for startups. You pay per end user, not per internal team member exploring the builder.
If your data already lives in Airtable or Google Sheets, Softr and Stacker let you transform it into polished customer portals without migration headaches.
Both platforms emphasize speed. You connect your data source, choose a template, and customize from there. Within a day, you can have a functional portal live. This matters when you're racing to deliver value before the next board meeting.
Softr particularly shines for membership portals and content-heavy applications. If your fintech offers educational resources, market insights, or gated content alongside transactional features, Softr handles that mix naturally.
Stacker takes a different approach, focusing on business process applications. It's well-suited for portals that involve workflows, for example customer onboarding, document collection, approval processes. The interface feels more like a business app than a website.
Both tools offer user authentication, custom domains, and reasonable permission controls. They won't match Retool's flexibility for complex logic, but for straightforward portal needs, they're dramatically faster to implement.
Blitz No Code positions itself specifically for teams that need to move from prototype to production quickly without compromising on quality. It's designed for the exact scenario you face: limited engineering resources but high expectations for the end result.
What makes Blitz interesting is its focus on the full development lifecycle. While other no-code tools excel at building, Blitz emphasizes what happens after: deployment, maintenance, scalability, and iteration. This matters tremendously for customer-facing portals where uptime and performance aren't negotiable.
The platform connects to your existing data infrastructure and generates production-grade applications with proper authentication, role-based access control, and API integrations built in. For fintech use cases, this means you're not retrofitting security features, as they're foundational.
Blitz also recognizes that "no-code" doesn't mean "no technical involvement ever." The platform allows your team to start without code, then progressively add custom logic as requirements evolve. Your PM can build the initial version, then engineers can enhance specific components without rebuilding from scratch. This flexibility is crucial as your startup scales and portal requirements become more sophisticated.
The tool particularly excels at handling complex business logic and multi-step workflows—exactly what fintech portals require. Whether it's KYC processes, document verification, or transaction approvals, Blitz provides the workflow engine to handle these scenarios without forcing you into rigid templates.
For teams that value speed but refuse to compromise on professional results, Blitz offers a middle path between simple builders and full custom development.
Bubble sits at the opposite end of the spectrum from Airtable. It's a full visual programming platform where you can build complete applications without code.
This is overkill for simple portals, but it's worth considering if your portal needs are evolving into something more substantial. Maybe you're building a full self-service platform where customers can not just view data but transact, communicate, and manage their accounts end-to-end.
Bubble gives you complete control over database schema, UI, workflows, and integrations. You're not constrained by templates or predefined components. If you can design it, you can build it in Bubble.
The tradeoff is time. Building in Bubble takes longer than other alternatives because you're creating from first principles. But for fintech products where the customer portal is becoming a competitive differentiator, that investment pays off.
Security is solid. Bubble applications can meet serious compliance requirements, and you maintain full control over data residency and access patterns.
Noloco is newer but purpose-built for exactly your use case: turning database data into customer-facing applications. It connects to Airtable, PostgreSQL, MySQL, or Google Sheets and generates a functional application automatically.
What sets Noloco apart is how it handles relationships and complex data models. If your fintech data involves multiple connected entities—customers, accounts, transactions, documents—Noloco understands those relationships and creates appropriate interfaces automatically.
The permissions model is particularly well-suited for multi-tenant scenarios. Each customer sees only their data, but you manage everything from a single application. This eliminates the Airtable problem of creating separate bases for each client.
Noloco is optimized for speed without sacrificing polish. The generated interfaces look professional out of the box, then you customize from there. For a 50-person startup, this balance of speed and quality is ideal.
Choosing a platform isn't about finding the "best" tool, rather finding the right match for your specific context. Here's how to think through your decision.
Regardless of which tool you choose, these practices will help you succeed.
Beyond solving the immediate problem of giving customers data access, the right portal platform delivers unexpected advantages.
Airtable serves a purpose, but customer-facing portals aren't it. For product managers at fintech startups, the stakes are too high to compromise on experience, security, or scalability.
The tools I've outlined (Retool, Softr, Stacker, Bubble, and Noloco) excel in different scenarios. Your specific choice depends on your timeline, technical resources, and complexity requirements. But any of them will serve you better than trying to force Airtable into a role it wasn't designed for.
Start small, pick one high-value use case, and ship something this quarter. Your customers will appreciate the transparency, your support team will appreciate the reduced load, and you'll have built a foundation that scales with your company.
The question isn't whether you need a proper customer portal solution. The question is which one you'll choose and when you'll get started. For fast-moving fintech startups, waiting isn't a strategy. Pick a tool, build something, and iterate based on what you learn. That's how products get built, and that's how companies win.
.png){kind=logo}
